All Blog Articles, arranged here by Year and Month.

People or Humans? Which group do I want to belong to?

There are a lot of people on the planet, but, it seems, very few Humans. That seems to be an outrageous statement, but to me, it appears to be that way. Why do I think that? It boils down to the definition of what a human is. For example, Humans don't kill people. Why? Humans by my definition are those who have understood the value of being alive and appreciate that unique, but temporary condition. Appreciating that about oneself, automatically means understanding that basic truth about every other Being on the planet.

The statement "There are a lot of people on the planet, but, it seems, very few Humans" reflects a profound observation about the nature of humanity. At first glance, it may sound provocative or even paradoxical, but the essence lies in a deeper exploration of what it truly means to be human. The assertion suggests that mere existence as a member of the Homo sapiens species does not automatically qualify an individual as a true "Human." Instead, the distinction lies in certain qualities that go beyond the biological definition.

The key to understanding this perspective lies in the definition provided: "Humans don't kill people." This declaration serves as a gateway to a more comprehensive understanding of what it means to be truly human. According to this viewpoint, genuine humanity is characterized by an appreciation for the value of life and a profound recognition of the unique and temporary nature of existence.

To elaborate, the concept implies that being human transcends the biological aspect of living within the Homo sapiens species. Instead, it involves a higher level of consciousness and self-awareness that goes beyond the mere fulfilment of basic survival instincts. It suggests an evolved state of being that acknowledges and cherishes the inherent value of life, both one's own and that of others.

The phrase "understood the value of being alive" suggests a level of mindfulness and introspection that goes beyond the superficial aspects of day-to-day living. It implies a conscious awareness of the gift of life and an active effort to appreciate and make the most of this unique opportunity. True humanity, according to this perspective, involves a continuous journey of self-discovery and an ongoing commitment to personal and collective growth.

Furthermore, the assertion emphasizes the universality of this understanding. "Appreciating that about oneself automatically means understanding that basic truth about every other Being on the planet." Here, the term "Being" extends beyond the human species, encompassing all forms of life on Earth. The idea is that a genuine human recognizes the interconnectedness of all living things and acknowledges the intrinsic value present in every form of existence.

In essence, the statement challenges the conventional view of humanity solely as a biological classification. It suggests that being human involves a conscious choice to embrace certain values, such as empathy, compassion, and a deep respect for life. This elevated understanding of humanity stands in contrast to behaviours that disregard the sanctity of life, such as violence and harm towards others.

While the assertion may sound idealistic, it prompts a reflection on the potential for growth and transformation inherent in the human experience. It encourages individuals to aspire to a higher level of consciousness and to cultivate qualities that contribute positively to the collective human experience. Ultimately, the observation invites us to question what it truly means to be human and to strive for a more profound and meaningful existence that extends beyond the boundaries of biological existence.

I ask myself, what is the purpose of religious organisations?

I appreciate that at the ground level, religion provides many kindnesses and support for people.

My beef is with the organisations, the Churches and Temples, synagogues and Mosques and all those institutions and in particular, the hierarchies and power structures; frequently also the holders of those positions, especially at the upper end of the hierarchies. Look at their finances, and you can see very quickly that being in charge of such sums, will corrupt anybody. This list is from Wikipedia:

 This does not include say the Moslem Church in Iran, which has the whole country at its disposal, as do others.

 According to a 7-year-old Guardian article: Religion in the United States is worth $1.2tn a year, making it equivalent to the 15th largest national economy in the world, according to a study. With financial clout like that, of course religion gets involved in all aspects of everyday life.

The purpose of religious organisations has been a subject of debate and discussion throughout history. While many argue that their primary goal is to serve as a source of spiritual guidance, moral values, and community support, others assert that underlying these noble intentions is a pursuit of power. This perspective posits that religious organisations, regardless of their faith or denomination, often seek influence and control over individuals, societies, and even governments.

One of the key arguments supporting the idea that religious organisations aim for power is rooted in their historical role as influential institutions. Throughout various epochs, religious institutions have played pivotal roles in shaping political landscapes, cultural norms, and social structures. The alignment between religious and political authorities has often been a symbiotic relationship, with each reinforcing the power of the other. In many cases, religious leaders have wielded considerable influence over rulers and governments, contributing to the establishment of laws and societal norms that reflect their religious doctrines.

Furthermore, the organizational structure of religious institutions itself can be seen as a mechanism for accumulating and maintaining power. Hierarchical systems, with clergy at the top, allow for centralized control and decision-making. This concentration of power can be leveraged to influence followers, shape religious interpretations, and establish doctrines that serve the interests of the institution. The ability to dictate moral standards and guide the beliefs of a significant portion of the population provides religious organisations with a unique form of power.

Another aspect of the argument is the economic influence that religious organisations often command. Many religious institutions amass substantial wealth through donations, tithes, and various forms of financial support from their followers. This financial power allows them to engage in activities beyond the spiritual realm, such as funding educational institutions, hospitals, and charitable endeavours. However, it also opens the door to potential exploitation and manipulation, as financial contributions may come with expectations of reciprocal influence.

Moreover, the role of religious organisations in shaping public opinion and influencing social attitudes cannot be overlooked. Through preaching, religious teachings, and moral guidance, these institutions can impact how their followers perceive various issues, from social justice to political ideologies. This influence over the mindset of a community contributes to the religious organisation's ability to shape public discourse and, consequently, hold sway over political and societal dynamics.

In conclusion, while the primary purpose of religious organisations is often framed in terms of spiritual guidance and moral development, the pursuit of power cannot be entirely dismissed. The historical, organizational, economic, and social dimensions of religious institutions contribute to a nuanced understanding of their role in society, acknowledging both their positive contributions and the potential for power-seeking behaviour.