Monthly Archive

The Value of Inner Peace in a World Obsessed with Short-Term Thinking

Looking around at the world today, it’s hard not to see history repeating itself—civilizations rising and falling, always with great pain. The same patterns of conflict, greed, and ignorance play out over and over, as if humanity is incapable of learning. The level of wilful stupidity continues to rise, even in an age where knowledge is more accessible than ever. And so, I find myself asking: where is this all leading?

Politically, we see increasing division, the rise of authoritarianism, and a world more unstable than ever. Climate change accelerates, with dire consequences that people in power either ignore or exploit for personal gain. Everywhere, short-term thinking dominates—reacting to immediate problems rather than addressing root causes. Meanwhile, the majority are distracted, numbed by entertainment, propaganda, and survival struggles.

It would be easy to feel hopeless in all of this, but I don’t. Not because I believe the world will miraculously correct itself, but because I have found something far more valuable than what the world offers: inner peace.

For me, this is what keeps me going. Not grand ideals of changing the world, but the understanding that what I do, how I contribute, and how I live does matter. It requires awareness and consciousness, and that’s enough. Prem Rawat’s message has reinforced this for me—true peace isn’t about fixing the world, but about discovering the peace that already exists within. And that, in turn, shapes how I move through life, regardless of what happens around me.

I keep hoping that more powerful people will come to recognize the wisdom in this message, that they will push for a different kind of agenda—one based on personal responsibility and a deeper understanding of what truly matters. But whether or not that happens, I am not waiting. My influence may be small, but it is not nothing. Even in small ways—through the words I write, the conversations I have, and the way I live—I can contribute to something meaningful.

Marcus Aurelius, who ruled a vast empire yet remained deeply philosophical, understood this well. He saw through the illusions of power and possession, recognizing their fleeting nature. As he wrote in Meditations: “Alexander the Great and his mule driver both died, and the same thing happened to both.” And again, he reminds us: “Loss is nothing else but change, and change is Nature’s delight.” The so-called power of individuals is always short-term; history moves on, and all that remains is how we have lived.

And here’s the hope: while the world may not change overnight, individuals do change. I’ve seen it. I’ve experienced it. When people reconnect with what is real inside them, they begin to see through the illusions. They make different choices. And sometimes, that’s enough to start a ripple effect.

So, I hold onto that. Not naive optimism, but a quiet, steady knowing: inner peace matters. It is worth more than anything this world can offer, and no matter what happens, it remains available—to anyone willing to look within.

How do you cultivate inner peace in a chaotic world? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Why are Jews worldwide not making an outcry about Gaza?

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine has resulted in a staggering disparity in casualties. As of March 2025, estimates suggest that between 46,600 and 62,000 Palestinians have been killed, while the total number of Israeli fatalities, including both civilians and military personnel, stands at around 1,700. The scale of destruction in Gaza, particularly among civilians—women, children, and the elderly—raises profound moral and ethical concerns.

This level of destruction bears a striking resemblance to some of the darkest chapters in human history. When entire populations are displaced, civilian infrastructure is destroyed, and thousands of innocents are killed, the term genocide inevitably arises. While Israel and its supporters argue that the military actions are necessary for self-defence, the disproportionate loss of Palestinian lives suggests something far more systemic: the systematic destruction of a people. Ironically, this mirrors aspects of the Holocaust—a term historically associated with the mass persecution of Jews but which, by definition, applies to any deliberate attempt to annihilate a group.

What makes this situation particularly paradoxical is that those carrying out these acts—Zionists—are themselves Semitic, as are the Palestinians they are killing. This alone highlights the absurdity of how the term antisemitism has been politically weaponized. While any criticism of Israeli state policy is often labelled antisemitic, the ongoing massacre of Palestinians—who are also Semitic—remains largely unchallenged by the same institutions that claim to fight discrimination. This selective outrage exposes how language can be manipulated to serve political and ideological ends.

From a religious perspective, the actions of the Israeli government and military are fundamentally at odds with Jewish law and ethical teachings. Judaism places a high value on justice, the sanctity of life, and the principle that all human beings are created in the image of God. The Torah, the Talmud, and countless rabbinical interpretations emphasize the obligation to protect the innocent and to seek peace over war. In Leviticus 19:16, it is written: “Do not stand idly by while your neighbour’s blood is shed.” Yet, what we see today is not merely idleness but active participation in large-scale destruction.

The concept of pikuach nefesh, which prioritizes the preservation of human life above nearly all other commandments, is another core tenet of Jewish law that appears to be ignored in this conflict. If Judaism truly upholds the principle that saving one life is akin to saving the entire world, then what does the killing of tens of thousands mean? The religious justifications often given for Zionism—especially those rooted in biblical claims to land—fail to account for the profound moral and ethical contradictions presented by the actual consequences of Israeli military policies.

Despite these contradictions, there has been little outcry from major Jewish religious or cultural institutions worldwide. While some Jewish voices—such as Jewish Voice for Peace and Neturei Karta—have condemned the Israeli government’s actions, mainstream Jewish organizations have either remained silent or actively supported Israel’s military actions. This silence raises troubling questions: Does adherence to Zionism now override adherence to Jewish law? Have political and nationalistic loyalties replaced religious and ethical ones?

It is difficult to reconcile the moral foundations of Judaism with the current reality in Gaza. A people who have suffered immense persecution throughout history—most notably in the Holocaust—are now perpetuating violence against another vulnerable group. The lessons of history should have instilled a deeper sense of empathy and a commitment to justice, rather than a replication of past atrocities under a different banner.

The conflict is not merely a military confrontation; it is a test of moral integrity. If Judaism is to remain true to its ethical foundations, then Jewish voices worldwide must rise in opposition to the ongoing slaughter of Palestinians. To do otherwise is to betray the very teachings that have defined Jewish identity for millennia. A just and peaceful future requires a fundamental reassessment of not only political policies but also the moral responsibilities that come with faith, history, and humanity. Not acting now will condemn all Jews for the future.

Mea Culpa. Time to be honest and really change habits.

Once again, the mirror has been held up to my face, and I have to admit—it’s not an experience I enjoy.

Anyone who knows me, or even just reads this blog, will be aware that my fundamental interest is in being the best version of myself. Not just in some abstract, self-improvement sense, but in a deeply human way—acknowledging my weaknesses, confronting my inconsistencies, and striving to align my actions with my principles. I want to fully enable the human aspects of myself—the ones rooted in kindness, awareness, and responsibility—rather than letting the greedier, self-serving side take control. That part exists within me too, of course. But the more I recognize it, the more I realize how crucial it is to keep it in check.

With that in mind, I often find myself bewildered by how many people continue living their lives as if the world isn’t changing around them. We know what’s happening—climate change is no longer some distant warning; it's here, manifesting in heatwaves, wildfires, floods, and vanishing biodiversity. The destruction of our natural environment is relentless, and yet, so many of us—myself included—continue with habits and choices that contribute to the problem.

Change has to start with me. No excuses, no justifications—just real, tangible change.

The Transport Conundrum

One aspect of my life that has long been a focus of change is transport. I gave up owning a car over 20 years ago. Living in Switzerland, I have access to an excellent public transport system, and I simply couldn't justify the ongoing costs of car ownership—payments, garage space, parking, insurance, fuel, and maintenance. The financial aspect alone made it an easy decision. If I ever truly need a car, I can rent one, but that’s a rare occurrence. I walk, take trains, buses, or cycle when I can. It’s second nature to me now.

But flying—ah, now there’s a different story.

I recently took a look at flightradar24.com, which tracks all airborne flights worldwide. It’s staggering. At any given moment, the sky is filled with thousands of planes, 24/7. Each one burning through fuel, spewing emissions, and contributing massively to the climate crisis. And for what? Convenience? Leisure? Business trips that could just as well be handled over a video call? The more I thought about it, the more absurd it seemed. So I made a decision: I will not fly unless it’s a genuine life-or-death situation—an unlikely scenario.

The alternative? Trains.

For example, I looked into how long it would take to travel from Switzerland to Leeds, UK, by train. Turns out, it’s doable in about 11 hours. That’s half a day—far from impossible. And while the cheapest, most environmentally friendly option is simply not going at all, if I must travel, I can do it without resorting to cars or planes. It’s a commitment I am making to myself and to the planet.

The Hypocrisy of Meat

But this is where my self-examination gets uncomfortable.

I was recently speaking with a friend who told me he was planning a trip to Japan for a holiday. He’s vegetarian, and during our conversation, he expressed his disbelief that people still eat meat, knowing what they know about the industry. He’s right, of course. We’ve all seen the documentaries, read the reports, and watched the undercover footage. The conditions in which most animals are raised—crowded, confined, unnatural—are appalling. Factory farms are infamous for their inhumane treatment, and disease outbreaks are common.

I know this. I’ve known it for years. And yet... I still eat meat.

Not as much as I used to, but enough that I can no longer hide behind ignorance or half-measures. The hard truth? I eat meat because I like the taste. And that means, consciously or not, I’ve been willing to overlook the suffering behind every meal. That realization stings. Because it means I’ve been living in contradiction—espousing one set of values while acting against them. That is not the person I want to be.

The Change Begins Now

So, here’s my commitment: I am phasing meat out of my diet completely. Not tomorrow, not instantly, but systematically and with intention. I will finish what I already have in my kitchen—because waste is no better than excess—but after that, I’m done. No more justifications, no more looking the other way.

And I know it won’t be easy. Habits are hard to break, especially when they are deeply ingrained in culture, convenience, and personal preference. But ease isn’t the point—integrity is.

I’m grateful to my friend for holding up the mirror and forcing me to see what I had been avoiding. It’s never comfortable to confront one’s own contradictions, but discomfort is often the precursor to real transformation.

A Final Thought

This isn’t about being perfect. It’s not about moral superiority or rigid dogma. It’s about trying—really trying—to live in alignment with my values. The world is burning, and while I can’t single-handedly stop climate change or dismantle factory farming, I can choose the role I play in it. That choice, repeated daily, is what ultimately defines who we are.

So here I am, making that choice. Mea culpa. No more excuses.